Art critics are often dismissed as pretentious, or for viewing things “too deeply.” there’s an existing cliché of the self-proclaimed expert overthinking a minimalist artwork, and this parody has been used as a shot to undermine both contemporary art and art theory. It can seem easy to look at art and its consumption as frivolous. And sure, there could also be existing self-important critics that will purposefully complicate their ideas or make art seem inaccessible. But, these varieties of people exist in most spheres of society, which shouldn’t undermine a whole practice.

An art critics’ main goal is just to look at the aesthetics, concepts, and/or context of an artwork so as to create an opinion and/or come to a conclusion. There’s no official definition or qualifications, but art can technically be defined as an entity created for the aim of creating an announcement or expressing something. Art is additionally often presented and shared with others, who then form opinions thereon. Art criticism is a vital facet within the process of making, sharing, and understanding art.

What makes art so important is its ability to evoke a range of responses. Sometimes the artist’s intent and a viewer’s perception of a piece of art don’t match. But these are the instances within which internal and external dialogue begin. Art criticism is that the practice of presenting questions and perspectives on work, and as result, encouraging discussion.

Art is numerous things but is most powerful when it emotionally impacts its viewers. This most frequently happens when an artwork is given a social or cultural context.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjZCUJoPWyw